Analysis: 2011 Corporate Social Strategy Will Focus on Corporate Website Integration (Part 1/2)

Part 1: External Goals (You are here)
Part 2: Internal Goals

The Corporate Social Strategist Must Plan for 2011
In the near future, I’ll be publishing a research report about the corporate social strategist and their program. In our survey these decision makers within corporations over social media programs, we asked about their goals for 2011. If you want to receive this upcoming report, I will send it to you directly,just  complete this form.  These corporate social strategists (which I’ve segmented as companies with over 1000 employees) the respondents were asked to select three top objectives. We found that they will focus on the following:

Social Strategist Goals for 2011: Go to Market

Analysis: Expect Companies to Aggregate Discussions, Struggle with Authentic Discussions and Be Frustrated with Listening Tools. Despite their aspirations, I don’t expect them to achieve all of their goals due to cultural limitations, insufficient technology, here’s my take as an Industry Analyst:

  • Out of balance, the Corporate Social Strategist plans to integrate social media with the corporate website. Social Strategists have deployed social media in existing social networking channels like Facebook, Twitter, and beyond.   Yet there’s an inbalance as they’ve joined customer where they are, but have not tied it back to their overall corporate website.  This is due to a few reasons: primarily stemming from the reactionary nature of “we must have a Facebook strategy” and not thinking it through, and also the freedom to not rely on legacy IT and web publication systems.  To restore balance, strategists will start to infuse the most trusted conversations of prospects and customers back to the corporate website closer to the point of purchase or during customer support.  Expect that the first steps will be simple sharing tools, then aggregating discussions from branded communities to then Facebook features.  Savvy strategists will know the risks and benefits of each of the 8 Stages of Corporate Website Integration and Social Media framework.  Vendor set: Community platforms, Aggregators like Echo, and the existing integration protocols and embeds provided by the social networks themselves.
  • Companies will focus on engaging in dialog with customers –yet expect most will do it wrong. The second most important goal (43%) companies said they’ll focus on is developing an ongoing dialog with customers using social channels.  Yet, our previous research focused directly on how they’ve attempted to do this on their own Facebook Pages shows that while they’re updating content at a rapid pace, they lack true dialog, engagement, and enabling the customer to leave their own voice.  Our research found that when it comes to dialog brands scored a meager 3.1 out of a total 5 points, while they scored 5 out of 5 points in ‘being up to date’.  While strategists may be focused on dialog with customers, most are unable to give up legacy behaviors of direct marketing, advertising, and spewing content in all channels.  Brands must follow the 8 Success Criteria of Facebook page marketing –or risk an ineffective investment or worse yet, brand backlash.  Vendor Set: Much of these skills will need to come from internal changes and training –until this is done, no third party vendor or application can help.
  • While volume of customer voices increase, corporations bolster listening efforts –despite substandard tools The amount of content being created in social channels is increasing exponentially, this hockey stick growth from Twitter indicates that Tweets grew 1,400% last year to 35 million per day.  To match, companies are already investing in brand monitoring systems, with deal sizes ranging from 50-100k per year per major product set.  Yet, despite this investment, most of these tools lack maturity and do not return refined data sets, nor actionable information.  Despite the technology challenge, the problem is getting worse for brands as the amount of content created by customers is increasing at a rapid pace.  Vendor Set: Brand monitoring companies, while effective at counting number of mentions lack ability to accurate sentiment, provide actionable insights, or make suggestions on what to do.  As outlined in the Social Business Stack for 2011, expect an emergence of the social analytics vendors to out place the commodity set of brand monitoring.

In future blog posts, I’ll be discussing other aspects from our research, such as budgets, internal goals, staffing size, orginziational models over this coming next few weeks. Feel free to use this data in your slides and planning (this is Open Research), kindly just provide attribution to Altimeter Group.

I look forward to your thoughts below, do you think companies will achieve these goals?

44 Replies to “Analysis: 2011 Corporate Social Strategy Will Focus on Corporate Website Integration (Part 1/2)”

  1. Great observations. Current “listening” efforts are largely focused on analysis of transactional data. In fact, when I say we are in analytics business, people immediately assume that we “monitor” customer WoM on Tweeter and Facebook. These efforts produce a lot of data with relatively low actionable content. Contextual analysis is still on the opposite site of equation – it can produce very highly actionable knowledge of your customer, but verifiable source data is relatively scarce.

  2. Great post, Jeremiah. I think you are spot on with the trend towards real social analytics. I actually wrote the other day that I predict (based on conversations we are having with brands & prospects in the market) that people willa ctually start to get fired in 2011 for reporting 'success' to their management in terms of: “mentions”, “likes”, and “followers”. The tie to commerce and real business metrics is a major wave that people will either be riding…or crushed by. By the way, can I ask whether the respondents were actually people with the title of “social strategist”, or were there a handful of titles that fell under? And, if the latter, what were they?

    Thx again for the insight!

    Sanjay Dholakia
    CEO, Crowd Factory
    @sdholakia

  3. Your insights here for the Social Strategist are spot-on, Jeremiah. We™ve found the same phenomenon you observed in our own customer base specifically related to brand monitoring verses social analytics. Crimson Hexagon customers such as Four Seasons Resorts, Microsoft Bing, HP, Ogilvy and Weber Shandwick all came to us because their listening strategies with other brand monitoring vendors weren™t delivering the deeper insights and analysis they needed to inform meaningful business decisions such as determining marketing investments and product or service development directions, among others. We™re happy to see you highlighting the considerable differences between simple brand monitoring and true social analytics as the lines are often blurred. We welcome the comparison and invite customers to investigate the important distinctions between the two.

    Wayne St. Amand
    http://www.crimsonhexagon.com

  4. This is fantastic data, Jeremiah, thanks for sharing here.

    I have to admit, it's comforting (well, at least a little bit) to know that since we've more or less had to focus on the “on-site” social pieces first — due to some unique national rules around marketing within our own footprint — at my company, we'll be a bit better prepared to engage those “fish” we'll be able to bring back to our “pond” when we're finally ready and allowed to fish where the fish are (Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter) as we finally execute our (patiently waiting) “external” social strategy.

Comments are closed.