{"id":2978,"date":"2009-02-21T00:44:55","date_gmt":"2009-02-21T07:44:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.web-strategist.com\/blog\/2009\/02\/21\/review-techcrunchs-year-in-review-report\/"},"modified":"2009-02-23T06:30:54","modified_gmt":"2009-02-23T13:30:54","slug":"review-techcrunchs-year-in-review-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/web-strategist.com\/blog\/2009\/02\/21\/review-techcrunchs-year-in-review-report\/","title":{"rendered":"Review: Techcrunch&#8217;s 2008 Year in Review Report"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I just finished reading (although some parts I skimmed, like the data tables) <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techcrunch.com\/2009\/02\/19\/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review\/\">Techcrunch&#8217;s 2008 Year In Review<\/a> a report they recently published at a fee, although the executive summary is available for free.  Techcrunch is monetizing Crunchbase, their wiki\/database of companies and funding, and is now offering research reports &#8211;the same industry I&#8217;m in.  Although my coverage is different as I do research for consumers and large brands, their&#8217;s are aimed at startups and VCs, and somewhat bumps up against <a href=\"http:\/\/radar.oreilly.com\/research\/\">O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s research arm.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Overall, this 143 pages of data offers a broad look at money movement within the technology, startup, and social media space, and is tracking funding, funding types, M&#038;A, VC activity, failed startups, layoffs, and other data.  The report also provides a summary of key trends in this space, and highlights key activities during the past year, and takes a stab at some changes that could come in 2009 in their &#8220;punch&#8221; (predictions) list.  The report self-admits that some of the data is not complete, and some industries have holes in them, as wiki-style research will always have limitations.<\/p>\n<p>Heather, (<a href=\"http:\/\/blog.crunchbase.com\/2009\/02\/22\/the-2008-year-in-review-gets-reviewed\/\">read her response<\/a>) the CEO of Techcrunch sent the report to me to review, and overall, the report is appropriately priced for a broad set of data that they&#8217;ve been harvesting in crunchbase, although there are some data missing, massaging of data, and a useful, but sometimes unrefined graphs.  For a first release, this is a solid start, and CEOs at startups should shell out the money if they&#8217;re out of touch with the industry and need a refresher, or if you&#8217;re an investor, the aggregation will also be helpful.<\/p>\n<p>While certainly not the refined reports that I&#8217;m used to seeing, the data is helpful for startups that need to a 30,000 foot view of the funding and market view.  Expect their future reports to be more refined, with more insight and recommendations.  It&#8217;s interesting to watch Techcrunch, which started out as a blog, grow into events, conferences, and now research &#8211;multiple revenue streams is a smart move in a difficult-to-monetize space. <\/p>\n<p><em>Takeaway<\/em>: While a lot of raw data, and a few good summaries, this report isn&#8217;t yet refined.  However those involved with funding (lender or startup seeking funding) should invest the $149 to quickly check the temperature of the market, and identify trends in finance and M&#038;A.  Expect these reports to evolve over coming years, as Techcrunch continues to expand beyond a blog.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I just finished reading (although some parts I skimmed, like the data tables) Techcrunch&rsquo;s 2008 Year In Review a report they recently published at a fee, although the executive summary is available for free. Techcrunch is monetizing Crunchbase, their wiki\/database of companies and funding, and &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/web-strategist.com\/blog\/2009\/02\/21\/review-techcrunchs-year-in-review-report\/\" class=\"more-link\"><span>Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Review: Techcrunch&#8217;s 2008 Year in Review Report<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2978","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-social-media"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/web-strategist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2978","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/web-strategist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/web-strategist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web-strategist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web-strategist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2978"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/web-strategist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2978\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/web-strategist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2978"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web-strategist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2978"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web-strategist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2978"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}